California Dreamin’ Meets Reality: Don’t Charge Your Electric Vehicle During Heat Waves

By Anthony Watts

California’s “green dream” of going to 100 percent electric vehicles by 2035 is hitting a major reality roadblock. Last week, during a major heat wave, the California Independent System Operator (CAISO), the agency charged with managing the state’s electric grid, sent out a tweet suggesting electric car owners shouldn’t be charging their electric vehicles.

In the accompanying media release, CAISO had this to say: [emphasis mine]

“…grid operators again ask the public to conserve electricity to help balance supply and demand on the grid and avoid service disruptions due to extreme heat across much of the Southwest.”

“To be as comfortable as possible during the Flex Alert hours, consumers are also strongly encouraged to take these steps earlier in the day:

Pre-charge electronic devices · Close window coverings to keep your home or apartment cool · Pre-charge electric vehicles

That’s right, you should NOT charge your electric vehicles during a heat wave in California. Why? Because, like the power supply system in many third-world countries, California’s electric power generators can’t deliver enough electricity to CAISO to meet demand.

Even Tesla got into the act, pushing this message out to Internet connected Tesla interior LCD screens during last year’s August heat wave:

“The current heat wave is impacting the grid in California. If possible, we ask that you reduce Supercharging and home charging between the hours of 4pm and 9pm to support the statewide efforts to manage demand.”

“Additionally, proactive utility shutoffs may limit charging options.”

Meanwhile in Sacramento, the Governor, legislators, and regulators still think electric vehicles are vital to California’s plan to reduce emissions over the next two decades. In 2020, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, by executive fiat, set 2035 as a target date for ending the sale of gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles as the way to fight “climate change” in the state.

At the same time, California has been looking to expand electric vehicle ownership, finding ways to inform everyone of the electric vehicle advantages, and make charging stations more accessible.

California suffers from an electric grid problem, because the state has eschewed reliable fossil fuels in favor of unreliable green energy, such as wind and solar power. This presents a problem, because such sources don’t work when the wind stagnates during heat waves, or at night when there’s no sunlight. Simultaneously, the state is exacerbating this problem, creating ever more demand for electricity by promoting electric vehicles and shutting down access to natural gas appliances. Deliberately, redesigning the state’s electric grid from one that historically suppled power 24 hours a day, seven days a week, regardless of the weather, to one that can only supply power reliably when weather conditions are Goldilock’s-like “just right,” was foolish; political malpractice, if you will.

Last year, California’s electric grid came within minutes of collapse due to heavy loads at the same time solar power slumped at sunset. On August 17, during the CAISO Board of Governors Meeting CAISO President Steve Berber let loose with this bit of reality. From transcript:

“You are trading the loss of 3000 megawatts for the collapse of the entire system of California and perhaps the entire West. … When you’re at the very edge and you have a contingency and you have no operating reserves, you risk entire system collapse.”

Nothing has changed significantly since then, so power shortfalls, perhaps even more severe than last summer’s, are likely to occur again this summer. That’s a sobering thought.

California has traded energy security to kneel before the false prophet of green energy. Instead of using reliable and affordable coal, natural gas, and nuclear power plants, they are increasingly relying on intermittent and unreliable industrial wind and solar facilities. The people of California, and perhaps the West in general, may pay the price for that homage if the power grid collapses during the ongoing heat wave.

A new heat wave looms on the horizon this week, even bigger than the one last week. This alert from the Sacramento National Weather Service Office tells the story.

National Weather Service Sacramento CA

147 PM PDT Wed Jun 23 2021

…Dangerous and long duration heatwave to impact the northern

and central Sacramento Valley…

Triple digit heat will return to northern California as early as Friday with further warming through the weekend with highs of 105 to 114 degrees.

The key phrase is “long duration event” and the key number is 114 degrees. And guess what? Lithium-Ion batteries should not be charged at such high temperature, as they risk going into thermal runaways and nearly impossible to extinguish fire.

As for the grid, with that heat wave looming, renewables, more appropriately called “unreliables,” will once again be tested. California’s green dream may very well be a bunch of electric vehicle owners that can’t get a charge. The poor and lower middle class, the people least likely to be able to afford California’s expensive power, or those who have no power due to the likely rolling blackouts to keep the grid from collapsing, will suffer the most.

Of course, the media will blame the heat wave on “climate change” while at the same time giving a collective shrug as to why electric vehicles are found on the road with dead batteries, while vehicles with internal combustion engines continue to reliably deliver people to their homes, shopping, and places of business.

Anthony Watts
Anthony Watts
Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.

Related Articles

7 COMMENTS

  1. I’m a retired airline pilot; which means a I’m a belt and suspenders guy. The safety record of flight is based on redundancy. So, get a small genset.

    Honda for example, makes a 1000 watt one that is less than $1,000USD and has two 15 amp ac plugs. Size is about carry-on luggage, weighs about 25 pounds and quiet.

    Most importantly, it will buy you piece of mind; and maybe a nice camping trip.
    Cheers, JimL

  2. Calling oil and natural gas reliable is simply not backed by science. Texas suffered huge losses of natural gas during the recent cold snap. On top of an unreliable source of fuel the process itself is inefficient and very vulnerable to extreme weather. The use of Oil, Gas and Coal use up more water and more electricity than any other renewable energy. There are multiple steps in all those processes for utilizing fossil fuels including extraction, transportation, conversion, then power generation. That means that these fuels need smooth sailing on multiple fronts which are all exposed to different risks depending on extreme weather as you saw in Texas and the huge shut down of natural gas. California and Texas are suffering from extreme weather conditions that the grids are simply not prepared for. There are lots of different issues happening including lack of weatherization, lack of transmission lines, lack of preparedness, poorly interconnected local grids and so much more. We can’t take the easy way out and put all the blame on electrification in general, that’s just naïve. Using electrification to mitigate future extreme weather is necessary and pressing, of course it will come with some challenges, but it is still largely competitive in today’s market and electric cars on top of being more efficient (energy wise) than Internal Combustion Engines (ICEs) they can also be utilized as mobile generators if they are charged during non-peak times which is very easy. Anthony Watts needs to do more research before making these bogus claims.

  3. In January on the Northern California coast we lost electrical power for two weeks in a powerful wind and rain storm. For EVs the nearest charging station was 75 miles away in Santa Rosa. For gas and diesel vehicles, the nearest filling station was in our town, Gualala, where gas-powered generators kept the fuel pumps running 24/7 for the two weeks without PG&E electricity. Our home was never without electricity since we, as do many others here, have propane-powered generators that come on automatically. Ours powers our whole house so we felt more like spectators instead of participants in one of the strongest storms in memory. The EV owners and solar-dependent neighbors could not say the same. Solar panels in a Northern California winter – very short and overcast days – don’t provide much power even in midday.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Reads

Latest Publication