Media Warns Of Polar Bear Inbreeding Disaster – Ignores Reality Over Theory

A new study published in Royal Society Journals publicized by many mainstream media outlets today, claims polar bears are in trouble from a loss of genetic diversity due to climate change. This claim has no basis in hard zoological or biological data, and no basis in actual sea ice measurements. It is a false alarm based in worst-case projections from computer models simulations.

As is true with all of the mainstream media’s coverage of the study, The Hill’s story, titled “Scientists warn polar bears are inbreeding due to climate change,” paints a dire picture. The study claims to have found a 10-percent decrease in the genetic diversity of polar bears in the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard over a 20-year period, which they say corresponds directly with the loss of Arctic Sea ice

“We found a drastic reduction in genetic diversity over the 20-year period,” one of the study’s authors, Simo Maduna of the Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, told ABC News. “And we could, in actual fact, associate this reduction in genetic diversity with the loss of sea ice.”

Zoologist and polar bear expert Susan Crawford, Ph.D., writes the study is meaningless.

“A new paper published [Wednesday] deals with an animal conservation issue I’ve addressed twice before: the theoretical assumption that loss of genetic diversity must be detrimental to species survival despite there being little evidence that this has been the case in real life.

For this new study, the authors carried out some complicated measuring of genetic diversity loss and inbreeding amongst and between Svalbard region polar bear populations between 1995 and 2016 (see map below), and then modelled what this could lead to in 100 generations (1210 years), with the over-anxious hand-wringing we’ve all come to expect from such prophesies.

As far as I can see, it’s all meaningless number-crunching without relevance to the real world of polar bears.”

She says the researchers didn’t bother to look at how actual animals are doing, but worked entirely in the theoretical world. Emphasis hers.

“To support their claim of harm from loss of genetic diversity, the authors of this paper cite four theoretical papers that assume as fact that loss of genetic diversity is harmful but not the evidence to back up the claim.

They apparently never bothered to look at species that have actually suffered dramatic loss of genetic diversity.”

The mainstream media has unquestioningly taken the study at face value, publishing headlines that make it look like genetic gloom and doom for the polar bears is just around the corner. Evidence from history shows this is false.

As pointed out in Climate at Glance: Polar Bears, the bears evolved hundreds of thousands of years ago and have thrived during much warmer global climate than today. We know for a fact that polar bears have survived periods of much warmer climate and lower sea ice than today. For example, the Holocene climatic optimum, from 9000 to 5000 years ago.

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, massive overhunting left polar bear populations decimated, resulting in remarkably low genetic diversity. This produced no apparent ill-effects in polar bears’ overall heath today. In fact, polar bear populations have strongly rebounded since hunting was banned as seen in Figure 1.

Figure 1, source: Chapter 10 of The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened (Dr. Susan Crockford 2019).

Ignoring historical events which sharply curtailed genetic diversity among polar bears, this new study models and extrapolates theoretical data without any actual evidence that a small decline in genetic diversity now could be devastating to polar bears more than 1000 years from now.

Meanwhile, the Arctic Sea ice isn’t cooperating with the polar bear narrative this year. Actual data shown in Figure 2 for this year looks like it is within bounds of natural variation. The trajectory in the graph below suggests 2021 may have the earliest minimum on record and second highest minimum since 2006.

Figure 2: graph from the National Snow and Ice Data Center showing extent of Arctic Sea ice on September 9th, 2021. Blue line is current extent, black line is average, and the grey area is normal aka standard deviations.

Dr. Crawford sums the brouhaha over the study nicely, writing, “This is conservation biology done WWF-style: loss of genetic diversity sounds bad to people who don’t know better, but real-world evidence shows it isn’t.”

“WWF-style” means that if you make polar bears’ supposed plight headline news, it is easier to keep the donation money train rolling. The World Wildlife Federation (WWF) raised $276 million in 2020, and with scary media stories like this one to help, it is a safe bet they’ll raise even more in 2021.

Follow the money.

Anthony Watts
Anthony Watts
Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Reads

Latest Publication