According to a recent article in Fox Business, House Republicans are planning to force the Biden administration to disclose its plans for restricting the use of fossil fuels through the issuing of Congressional “Resolutions of Inquiry.” Republicans are right to attempt to force the Biden administration to acknowledge its role in the present energy crisis and how its “whole of government” approach to fighting climate change has contributed to high and rising energy prices, shortages, and blackouts.

The article, titled “GOP aims to use little-known legislative tool to force Biden’s hand on energy crisis,” explains that committee Republicans have filed official information requests known as “Resolutions of Inquiry”(ROIs) which Democrats have to acknowledge and either deliver the requested documents or reject the requests.

“ROIs, if approved, enable the House to forcefully obtain factual information and documentation from the White House,” writes Fox Business. Republican representatives have introduced four ROIs concerning specific Biden administration energy and climate policies.

One ROI offered by Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) requests “documentation related to the Biden administration’s use of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve ‘for political purposes.’” Fox Business describes the remaining energy and climate ROIs:

Rep. Greg Pence (R-IN) introduced a separate ROI requesting documentation related to actions taken by the Biden administration impacting the U.S. power grid.

Reps. Bill Johnson (R-OH) and Jeff Duncan (R-SC), filed the other two ROIs that request documentation regarding the White House’s internal discussions about declaring a national climate emergency and its response to rising energy prices, respectively. Duncan’s measure would include documents related to the administration’s green energy push, decision to blame Russian President Vladimir Putin for the domestic energy crunch, and communications about a potential crude oil export ban.

Government rules regarding ROIs specify that the requests must be directed towards the President himself, or other Cabinet officers, who have 14 days to comply with information requests. Unfortunately, there is no enforcement mechanism that can force an administration to comply with an ROI. House rules say, in the case of refusal to comply, the party delivering the ROIs may “renew its inquiry (3 Hinds § 1890) or demand a further or more complete answer (3 Hinds § 1891; 6 Cannon § 435).”

Climate Realism has discussed negative effects resulting from the Biden Administration’s energy and climate initiatives before, for example, in the post “Days Before Ukraine War Went Hot, John Kerry Bemoaned It as a Distraction from Climate Action.”

Other Heartland Institute publications pointed out that Biden’s decision to immediately cancel the Keystone XL pipeline would have no no impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but it did damage a partnership with our country’s closest ally, Canada.

Biden also withdrew American support from the EastMed pipeline, which was set to supply our European allies with natural gas from Israel, while virtually simultaneously removing sanctions from Russia’s Nord Stream 2 pipeline. It would be interesting to know why Biden thought natural gas from Israel was bad for Europe, and why, by contrast, his administration thought natural gas from Russia was good.

The American public would benefit from the transparent release of information regarding these decisions. If, through the ROI process, Republicans can get documentation that answers some questions about Biden’s energy and climate actions, the public will be better able to make informed decisions during the next two elections. And since the Biden administration regularly touts its supposed commitment to transparency, if Biden and his cabinet members ignore Republicans’ ROI requests, this will also reveal something to the American public as well.


  1. It’s more like a “whole of government” approach to destroying the fossil fuel industries and all of the end uses which rely on them.

    It is already leading to what the WSJ described as “orderly liquidation” in the industries.

    I have seen nothing which indicates how the value of stranded assets is going to be addressed.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here