One of the most common arguments climate alarmists make is that the rate of sea-level rise is “accelerating” or rising faster every year.
Sea-level data reported from satellites indicate seas are rising approximately of 3.3 mm/year (See Figure 1). By contrast, tidal stations have recorded a rise of approximately 1 to 2 mm annually, a rate which is little changed over the century or so for which we have adequate records. Indeed, as reported in Climate at a Glance: Sea Level Rise, the oldest tide gauge in the USA, in New York City, shows no acceleration at all going back to 1850.
Why the large difference?
The answer it turns out is simple. When NASA and NOAA launched new satellites, the data they produced wasn’t the same as the data recorded by earlier satellites.
Figure 1. University of Colorado sea level data, showing the trend and acceleration. Note that the graph shows no overlap between the individual satellite records. SOURCE: UCSLR Group
Citizen scientist Willis Eschenbach obtained NOAA’s Excel spreadsheet showing the full dataset for each of the four satellites. He plotted the NOAA data. Unlike the Colorado data above, it included the full overlap between the individual satellites. He then looked at the rate of sea-level rise shown by each of the four satellites separately. Figure 2 shows that result.
Figure 2. NOAA sea level data, showing the trend of each of the full individual satellite records and the overall trend. SOURCE: NOAA Excel Spreadsheet
The two most recent satellites record significantly higher rates of sea-level rise than the earlier two satellites. The first two satellites agree quite well, but they both show a much smaller trend than the latter two satellites. Neither set of the satellite record shows any accelerating trend. The UC scientists simply combined the two dissimilar data sets, plotted a new trend showing acceleration, and didn’t mention the difference.
See the complete analysis here.
This is either incompetent or dishonest, and certainly not up to even the simplest of basic science principles. Virtually any high school or college student who presented such work for a class would get called out on it by their instructor for showing a false trend.
This could explain why former President Barack Obama and Bill Gates felt secure when they each bought ocean front property. They proclaim loudly that seas are rising dangerously, but like the many of climate alarmists, their actions belie their words because they know the data is badly flawed. The data shows seas are not rising at an accelerated rate.
it may be rising slower than previous thought but it still rising. this not a reason to ignore climate change.
Nice one Willis.
Well the δLOD did always show that it was a false claim.
Where exactly do these people do their science?
Thank you Anthony– great info.
PS – I noticed almost a week ago that NOAA’s site is not loading – still not. Wonder if they are up to something?
Quite simple really, it’s all within the limits of error, there are always limits to the accuracy of a measurement, all the posturing and hysteria is meaningless, the measurements are all within the % of error. The very idea of defining the mean temperature of the earth is a snipe hunt, ask a metrologist.
If sea level rise were an issue, I’m sure Edison would not have buried cans of spent nuclear fuel rods ON THE BEACH at San Onofre.
San Francisco, not New York is the oldest tide gauge station in the United States.
The acceleration shown in the C-SLRG releases in 2018 and 2020 are a result of rewriting the historical data from 1992-1998